Union: California Teachers Highest Paid in Nation
Written by CA Political News on March 08, 2009, 07:04 PM

Editorial: Golden state for teachers
California teachers the highest-paid in U.S.


Orange County Register editorial, 3/8/09


California's largest public school teachers' union is trying to panic voters by claiming this state's government schools are pitifully underfunded. Baloney.

The California Teachers' Association wants voters to approve ballot measure 1B on the May 19 ballot, to drain $9.3 billion more out of taxpayers' pockets to pour into teachers' wallets. Beware.

The CTA claims California ranked 47th in the nation in per-pupil spending in 2006, but only after applying an arcane formula that "adjusted for regional differences."

California public school teachers must be woefully underpaid, right? Not exactly. But let's not quibble. Let's use teacher union statistics.

According to the CTA's parent union, the National Education Association, California teachers were the nation's top-paid, with $64,424 average annual salary in 2007-08.

Don't take just the NEA's word for it. The other mammoth national public school teacher union, the American Federation of Teachers AFL-CIO, said the year before the CTA study that "for the second consecutive year, California had the highest average teacher salary in 2006-07 at $63,640, or about 25 percent above the national average."

If California teachers are so highly paid, and the CTA is telling the truth about California's low per-pupil spending, what drags down the average? Are schools drastically underfunding janitorial services or paying their administrators way too little? We don't know.

One thing is clear, however. By the way the nation's largest teachers' unions measure, California teachers do pretty well compared with their counterparts in 49 other states.

Because of its huge student population and its high-priced teachers, California spends 44 percent more on K-12 public education than does Texas, the next highest-spending state, $59 billion versus $41 billion. What do Californians get for this huge public school price tag?

Education Week magazine reports that a mere 22 percent of California fourth-graders are proficient in reading, and 23 percent of eighth-graders are proficient in math. Those marks are substantially lower than the 31 percent national average in both categories.

That raises a reasonable question. If California taxpayers pay public school teachers so much more, why do California students perform so much worse?

The teachers' union apparently wants California voters to believe the answer is: "Because taxpayers don't pay us enough." Excuse us for saying so, but that doesn't seem to add up.

Blog Comments

Joe Teacher
I guess if the cost of living is not taken into account when we talk about salaries. That's right a gallon of gas cost just as much here as anywhere in the U.S and so does a gallon of milk. Those greedy teachers, how dare they try to survive on the measely salary paid by their district since living in California is so cheap.
Married to a Teacher
I'm a Republican and this a ridiculous article. How can you not factor in the cost of living? That is a flat out dumb argument. If raising taxes are the answer, and it can only be if the funds generated are PROPERLY USED, than this Republican says hit the tax button. There are very few areas where I believe taxing is acceptable, where it benefits the military, the education of our youth and the care taking of our elderly are 3 examples. Whatever it takes to keep these kids in school, these teachers paid ADEQUATELY and our future bright.
MEd Teacher
Someone needs to do more reserch! This article is certainly not a valid comparison of salary to responsibility, costs of living, education etc. etc. etc. Teachers should be paid more in every state if you want the future generations to have a better education than China! Teachers spend, on average, 60-80 hours per week teaching, assessing and planning for students. This is not to mention that now the classes include autistic, behavioral disorders, hearng impaired and other learning disabled students. The teacher is responsible for ALL of the students succeeding at grade level. Oh, and they need to teach them English too! So if you have a problem with paying for such a demanding job, put you child into private school and fork out $25K a year.
Halftank
Is public education too big to fail? I believe we should shut down the public schools, especially here in California. Don't tie funding to attendance. Those parents who don't value an education can keep their children at home to make more room for those who wish to learn. Trust me, if we teachers shut down the schools, within a few days our state and federal government would give us as much as they gave the banks and auto industry. The public would demand it. Research shows that teachers can predict school failure with 80 percent accuracy by the time a child is in third grade. I see no reason for sending children to high school if they are failing elementary school at such an alarming rate. Also, junior colleges are now what sixth grade used to be. I can't figure out why teachers won't play hardball against the idiots who think they know something about education.
Concerned
Let's see, mid $60's (average)for 9 months work a year. Guaranteed job based on tenure regardless of performance, Pension plans that would make a prostitute blush, coupled with early retirement. Yeah, its all for the kids!

New Comment




simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)