|
LA Times Upset Doctors Refuse to Kill People
Written by on May 07, 2009, 11:15 AM
Terminally ill patients who want to utilize a new law to end their agony often find that physicians, citing moral objections, refuse to take part. By Kim Murphy, LA Times, 5/7/09 Reporting from Kennewick, Wash. Stephen Wallace had watched his wife die of cancer 22 years ago, using up the morphine as fast as they could put it into her and begging for more. NoNo, he said then. I won't let this happen to me. So when he was diagnosed with an advanced case of pancreatic cancer March 8, and given a few days to a few weeks to live, Wallace hoped to go quickly. He told his doctor and family that he wanted to take advantage of Washington state's new law allowing physicians to prescribe a fatal dose of barbiturates to terminal patients. His five children agreed, but his doctor balked, citing moral reservations. The family appealed to the hospital, got nowhere, and called two other hospitals in towns nearby. None of the doctors in the area was willing to give Wallace, 76, the pills for his deadly sleep. Cancer of the pancreas has a cruel reputation, delivering what some say is the most intense pain humans can imagine. It killed Wallace on April 8. "It was very hard to watch my father die that way," said Tricia Crnkovich, who took turns with her brothers and sisters in Wallace's small bedroom as he shrank from 250 pounds to 60, losing most of the weight in the two months before he died. "I'll tell you, if I ever get cancer," she said, "I don't want to put my kids through that." On March 5, But outside the larger population centers around "We knew that it would be harder to find attending and consulting physicians in more rural areas," said Robb Miller, executive director of the advocacy group Compassion & Choices of Wallace raised his family here amid the arid farmland that spreads out from the confluence of the The area also is home to the For most of his life, Wallace worked at From the moment he was diagnosed, the family said, Wallace refused even to go into hospice care. "When he retired in '94, he said, 'I bought this bed, and I will die in this bed,' " said his daughter-in-law, Ginny Wallace. But Wallace's physician could not bring himself to assist, the family said. Dr. Idar Rommen, a family practitioner in "To me, personally, giving a patient a suicide pill is like abdicating my role," Rommen said. "I'm here to heal and to make better. And the other just doesn't seem like that's what I went into medicine to do." The extent of the hurdles patients face in the "There was no feedback," said executive director Nicole Austin. "We're trying to walk a very neutral line. It's their decision as physicians if they choose to participate. I sense that it will be a challenge in this community." Only about a third of Similar reservations have made it difficult to get assisted-suicide statutes on the books in other states. California lawmakers have failed several times to pass such legislation, although late last year they adopted a measure requiring terminal patients be counseled on various end-of-life options, including the right to be heavily sedated and withdrawn from food and water. Through 2008, 401 people in Proponents characterize the laws as a means of allowing the terminally ill to have some say over how and when they will die. Critics, including the American Medical Assn., contend that the better response is to offer patients adequate pain medication and reassurance. "They want to force doctors to act against their conscience and to become essentially vending machines for individuals who requisition overdoses to kill themselves," said William L. Toffler, a professor of family medicine and executive director of Physicians for Compassionate Care Education Foundation, which has opposed assisted-suicide statutes. "The solution to suffering," he said, "never is to eliminate the sufferer." But for Wallace, alleviating the pain did not appear to be an option. Crnkovich said her father had been given strong medications when he went home from the hospital, but that his nurses had resisted increasing the dosage as his pain grew more intense. Soon Wallace's mental state began to deteriorate. Because the assisted-suicide law requires a 15-day waiting period between the first oral and the first written requests for lethal medication, and an additional 48 hours before the prescription can be written, he no longer qualified. "He couldn't talk for the last eight days," son Steve Wallace said. "He was not in contact with reality. I'd come in there, and he'd call me somebody else." Near the end, Steve and Ginny could hardly stand to be in the house because his father was in so much pain. By the time the doctor said his medication should be increased despite the nurses' concerns, it was too late. "He was just moaning and screaming, and it got really bad on Friday," Ginny said. "By Monday when we left, he was just screaming at the top of his lungs." Wallace was dead two days later. An autopsy revealed that the cancer had consumed his pancreas, liver and parts of both kidneys and lungs. Crnkovich said her father had asked family members to speak out about his failure to find a doctor to help him. They have met with state and federal legislators, telephoned hospitals and spoken with the media. "Since I started talking, I've had people come up to me in the supermarket parking lot and say, 'Murder's murder.' And other people have come up to me and said, 'Thank you. Now I know what to do if the time comes,' " she said. "People don't know what it's really about," her brother added. "It's not about killing people. It's about people that are going to die, but don't want to go through hell to do it." New Comment |
Sign our PetitionsPoll of the dayCategories
Archives
|


Blog Comments