The Teacher Unions’ War Against Military Families
Written by CA Political News on July 01, 2009, 06:52 PM

The Teacher Unions War Against Military Families

By Rachel Chaney, Policy Fellow, Education Studies, Pacific Research Institute, 6/24/09

The Senate Armed Services Committee is considering a proposal to provide military families with tuition vouchers. The idea enjoys support in the military, but the National Education Association (NEA) has mounted an attack in a letter to the Committee as part of its ongoing battle against educational choice.

Both the NEA and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have militantly opposed the continuation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program which provides tuition vouchers to approximately 1,700 students in the DC area. Parents clearly recognize the advantage of vouchers since the number of applicants last year far exceeded the number of available spots. And military families, who make great sacrifices for their country and are frequently on the move, could also benefit from such a choice program.

Patricia Davis, wife of Chief Master Sgt. James Davis of the 316th Wing, told the Committee that military families are often assigned to areas with low-quality schools, and that our kids education should not have to suffer because of military obligations. Teacher unions ignore the needs of these students, and all others, in their ongoing battle to prevent competition, protect mediocrity, and distort the truth.

In the recent letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee, for example, NEA Director of Government Relations Diane Shust and Manager of Federal Advocacy Randall Moody claim that, the DC voucher pilot program, which is set to expire this year, has been a failure.  In fact, over its five-year span, the pilot program has yielded no evidence of positive impact on student achievement.

This claim flies in the face of Department of Education research that shows reading gains for certain subgroups and is at most inconclusive about the gains overall. Declaring the program a failure ignores these findings, and is especially troubling given that other voucher programs have shown marked success rates only four or five years after their inception. Since the DC program is only three years old, drawing any conclusions about success or failure should be postponed until students using the vouchers have had more time to profit from their enrollment in private schools.

Shust and Moody also warn that, Voucher schools are permitted to maintain their admissions standards and can reject any public school student they choose. . . In contrast, public schools serve all students who come through their doors. This argument ignores the reality that the same anti-discrimination laws govern private and religious schools.

The NEA letter falsely claims that public schools are open to all. In reality, students must attend the school in their neighborhood, regardless of its performance or safety. Since many of the highest performing public schools are in wealthy areas that most Americans cannot afford, many children are locked out of the best schools. Vouchers would allow all children to apply to all schools regardless of parental income or house location.

Teacher unions flimsy arguments should come as no surprise given the self-interested nature of union efforts to oppose school choice. The highly politicized nature of the debate on vouchers obscures what is really at stake. Until politicians put education and opportunity before lobbyists and special interests, students will remain victims of a system that forces them to stay in underperforming schools and denies them the education they deserve.

It is time for congressional leaders, President Obama, and Secretary Duncan to work together for choice so that all children have access to the same quality education their own children enjoy. Until that happens, Americas promise of equal opportunity for all will ring hollow.

Blog Comments

statb
We need to get rid of teachers unions
Laura
"What I think" is that every red-blooded American patriot, military and civilian, should get their kids OUT of public school all together. One parent stay home with them, yes that means sacrifice...time for US to fight the Nanny State..beginning with the biggest Nanny of all: public schools, that do little more than prep our kids for institutionalized life. ie: jail/prison; from uniforms, to gangs/cliques, to bells signaling a change of venue,that make them salivate like Pavlov's puppies, but equally as obedient/trained/indoctrinated.
Dan Smith
Why does the government still need to be in the education business at all? No. Educating kids is not rocket science - we know other providers can do as well or better. Teacher unions are all about protecting their cushy jobs, not about educating kids.
Robert Burns
I propose that military families be given 1st choice of vouchers, but we need to get rid of bad schools regardless.
Robert Burns
I propose that military families be given 1st choice of vouchers, but we need to get rid of bad schools regardless.
Alfonso
Public Schools = Socialist Indoctrination Centers
Arne Simonsen
Thank goodness my kids went to DODDS (Department of Defense Dependents Schools) overseas and on the stateside bases (until we got to Fort Ord in 1983). They were so far ahead of their respective classmates in the Seaside Unified School District, that I had to battle to get them in advanced classes.
reeves
School Vouchers penalize property owners while renters (most often with the most children) end up getting a tax-free education. The property owner ends up paying again to send other people's children to private schools. Meanwhile, private schools are forced by law to admit students they might otherwise reject if given the choice. This is hardly freedom. Instead this is redistribution of wealth in favor of a particular class of people favored by our elected officials - which amounts to buying votes. This country was not set up to play class warfare with any particular class of citizen. Equality under the law is trashed in this case. The only rational (and Constitutional) solution for freedom of choice in education is to repeal Woodrow Wilson's 1913 mandate on government school attendance. Bring freedomn of choice back by rescinding this archaic law and allowing both private and public schools to compete for students. Free competition would not only create better schools, but also lower costs, as it would do what capitalism always does - benefit the consumer. School vouchers are just another ploy of the conservatives to smoke screen the real issue, which is poor-quality education wrought by the inept government. Private education is what all our Founders had (both the poor and the rich classes), and it served them quite well, as we have seen for over two hundred years.
Chick McIlroy
Your article is not entirely fair. In practice Private schools can set their own criteria for admission. And do not have to admit everybody that walks through the door. You should research why some schools are earmarked as educationally poor and others high. Your article smears all public schools. Not all public schools follow unfair positions of the NEA.
Cathy West
It is the Public School's 'brain-washing', lies, education of social group thinking to the exclusion of individual merit of the students they are responsible to lead by teaching - Not Indoctrinating, That Is The Problem! Our Founders knew, as We All Know, that Our Children are the link that makes "..endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.." For The Individual to pursue. It is our individual strength within the group, represented by job, study, God, Values, that makes The United States of America The Sovereign Nation Among many Sovereign States! Public education is mandatory for every child and Includes the history of this Nation & its States as well as an understanding of "In God We Trust". While all other kinds of schooling are fine, it is not OK to continue to ignore what is being taught And What is being left out of the education of all our Children. It is not OK for Unions, regardless or origin, to define where any child must be educated. Further it is not OK to grind learning into children whether through tests as goals, punishment because the child doesn't learn or acts out, or the inability of teachers/leaders to understand that there is more than one way to learn any subject. That learning for animals including the human one, starts at birth and doesn't stop after death! 'Teacher' is a fine art that struggles for existance within the politicking of today's mentality & decreased value system. Parents and the community, Quit ignoring or turning your back on the injustice of public education. The government, union mentality of no accountability must stop. We must return to Integrity of Ideas and Actions - Now! Several Generations of public school children are now in the working world and have No Idea What 'No probable cause', innocent until proven guilty, protection of each individuals person, houses, papers, and effects..etc. Endowed by our Creator is also not a familiar phrase to many young people and many don't know anything about God or Jesus. 'Take Back Our Country' is the First Opportunity to speak of Our Belief in Government Of By & For The People. That is one good thing Mr. Obama has done for all America - challenge All Of Us to Renew Who We Are And What We, native or naturalized, Stand For. Also, what we stand against!! Thank you, Cathy West, San Marcos, CA
Sharon
I am a 1st year pink slipped teacher in CA. with virtually no hope of getting a teaching job ANYWHERE, public or private. I am saddened and angry at finally, after 18 years in education, (I'm 55) achieving my carer goal of becoming a teacher and I'm finished after only 1 year. I was not a strong union supporter before the layoffs and I definitely am not supportive now. Our local union did absolutely NOTHING to assist us or support us through the process as most of the board members are 15+ year employees and don't care about us newbies. I LOVED my job and LOVED my students (Kindergarten). It was by no means a "cushy" job, as described by another comment. It was 10-12 hour days prepping for all the daily activities that we had to do (no parent help) and also what we wanted to do. We had a fabulous Kinder team that worked exceptionally well together and the students did outstanding. But in the end, three from our team were lost due to our state legislators squandering the education funds to further their own personal agendas. If you think teachers are overpaid, call your child's (or any) teacher and schedule some days to come in and volunteer. Not just 1 or 2 days, but over a month or two. See how many other parents come in to help, see how many kids have to be taught manners, proper behavior, etc. See how much time is taken away from other students to take care of the parenting issues that are not dealt with at home. I am NOT complaining, I am stating what happens in the 1st 20 min. of class at most elementary levels. You say you have no time to visit or volunteer? Then your child's education is what it is. You probably don't have time for them at home either. I'm a parent and a grandparent. If I knew my child or grandchild was attending a lower performing school I would be making time to do what I could do to help. I wouldn't sit around and complain...like most people prefer to do. If a military family has to attend a public school that is not high performing because that is the one in their neighborhood, then so be it. I appreciate the jobs well done by the members of our military but that sentiment needs to go both ways. You support us and we support you. You can read all the BS reports you want; you can listen to all the political BS from Bush to Obama. Education in the US isn't going to change anytime soon.
Marjorie Preston
First, I will admit that my daughter teaches in a Christian school. The tuition there is about $4500 a year. Due to people losing jobs some of them cannot afford the tuition and have had to take their kids out of the school. She observed if enough of them do the district will have to build a new school and pay the full cost of educating those kids. No more will they get away with the parents paying. The community will have to pay the between 8 and 12 thousand dollars apiece to educate those kids. And I use the term educate very loosely. This is the district which wants to start sex education in the 1st grade! They are also weaker on academics than her school. If necessary she will home school them so they can get a decent education. Unfortunately many families cannot do that because both parents work. It seems so strange. The District has a great deal now. If they gave the parents a voucher it would still be a lot less than the inefficient public school spends per pupil.
Wiccanwolf
I agree the unions and the leftists behind them need to be ran out of the country. We at one time had the best public educational system in the world basically. It was in the 1950's that the Communists and Socialists slowly like a virus invaded the academic community. They spread like a cancer and finally have affected the brain if the body. Now ask yourself why is it more and more people are opting to "Home School"? Maybe they are brighter than the corrupt unions and want intelligent partiotic children.
Louis McCarten
It sounds to me very much like members of the teachers' Unions are intentionally using bogus arguments to hide the fact that they are discriminating against military families on account of their own political beliefs. I don't like it at all.

New Comment




simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)