There is good news in Los Angeles. Soon the LA Times is going to be sold and hopefully common sense and decency will return to the newspaper—gone for decades.
The LA Times, in an editorial wants to allow illegal alien gang members to have amnesty. Doesn’t Los Angeles have enough crime? Don’t the Times want to end the Second Amendment? Why does the brilliant people who work for the Times, think their readers should live without fear of criminals, gangs and assaults?
Someone please put the editors of the out of their misery and sell the paper to the Koch Brothers—then show the editors to the unemployment office.
LA Times Editors Say Gang Members Deserve Amnesty
By Dan Stein, Immigration Reform, 5/17/13
LA Times Editors Say Gang Members Deserve Amnesty
“The Senate Judiciary Committee is just beginning its markup of the bipartisan immigration bill, but already opponents and supporters of the sweeping legislation are fighting over which immigrants should be allowed to legalize their status and which should be deported,” the LA Times says in an editorial.
“Clearly it makes sense to refuse legal status to immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes. But some lawmakers, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), are backing a provision that goes too far, excluding immigrants who have no criminal history simply because their names appear in a database of gang members or on a gang injunction.”
Immigration and gang labels
Editorial
Being in a gang database or on an injunction shouldn’t be enough to disqualify an immigrant from legal status, as a senator proposes.
May 14, 2013|By The Times editorial board
The Senate Judiciary Committee is just beginning its markup of the bipartisan immigration bill, but already opponents and supporters of the sweeping legislation are fighting over which immigrants should be allowed to legalize their status and which should be deported.
Clearly it makes sense to refuse legal status to immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes. But some lawmakers, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), are backing a provision that goes too far, excluding immigrants who have no criminal history simply because their names appear in a database of gang members or on a gang injunction.
